Election Day: Tuesday, Nov 3 • Early voting Oct 24 – Nov 1 • — days left
Proposed Local Law · 2027

Data Center & Crypto Mining Ban

A townwide prohibition on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities in every zoning district — written with no load threshold to game, no way to phase around it, and an express carve-out for the ordinary server rooms that businesses and schools already run.

← All proposed laws

Across New York, towns are waking up to find a data center proposed next door — a windowless industrial building drawing as much electricity as a small city, running cooling equipment around the clock, consuming millions of gallons of water, and employing a handful of people. As of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts of data center load was sitting in New York's grid interconnection queue, with more than eight gigawatts of that added in 2025 alone. The Governor's Executive Order No. 62 acknowledges the strain — and expressly leaves the zoning decision to local governments.

Clarkstown should make that decision before an application lands, not during one. This proposed local law amends Chapter 290 to define data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities and prohibit them in every zoning district in town.

What the law does

Prohibits data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities as land uses in all zoning districts of the Town, by adding them to the prohibited-uses list in § 290-18 — rather than relying on their mere absence from the use tables.
Defines both uses expressly in § 290-3, and treats them as two separate land uses, so that prohibiting one is never construed to permit the other.
Applies with no minimum electrical load, floor area, site area, server count, or hash rate — closing the loophole that lets a project slip in under a threshold.
Requires aggregation across contiguous lots under common ownership or control, and applies without regard to phasing, so a facility cannot be broken into pieces, stages, or separate containerized units to escape the definition.
Applies regardless of what the project is called in an application, permit, deed, or lease — an "office," "warehouse," "laboratory," or "utility substation" that functions as a data center is a data center.
Expressly preserves ordinary server rooms. An Accessory Data Center — an IT installation genuinely incidental to a principal use on the same lot — is exempt, subject to limits on floor area, proportion, and connected electrical load.
Does not terminate any use lawfully established and operating on the effective date; those are governed by the town’s existing nonconforming-use provisions.

Why this proposal is on the table

Electric demand. Data centers draw power wildly disproportionate to the jobs and tax base they bring. Executive Order No. 62 states New York’s policy plainly: the cost of the electric system upgrades these large loads require should not be paid for by everyday New Yorkers. Clarkstown has never studied whether its distribution infrastructure could carry a load of that magnitude.
Water and sewer. These facilities consume substantial water for cooling. Clarkstown’s water supply and sanitary sewer systems were never designed or sized for that demand, and diverting water to this use puts availability, reliability, and cost at risk for the homes and businesses already here.
Noise and community character. Cooling systems and backup generators run continuously. That is incompatible with our residential and hamlet center districts — and with the low-impact, park-like character the town’s own code intends for the Limited Light Industrial Office district.
Inefficient use of industrial land. Compared with the office, manufacturing, storage, and warehousing uses our LIO and M districts are meant to host, a data center occupies enormous land, building volume, and utility capacity while employing comparatively few people.
Local authority is intact. Executive Order No. 62’s state-permit abeyance expressly does not apply to local government approvals, and reaches only facilities at or above 50 megawatts. The zoning question is Clarkstown’s to answer — including for everything below that threshold.

How it fits the town’s own plan

The 2021 Comprehensive Plan Update commits Clarkstown to protecting its potable water sources and supply, acting on noise, dust, odor and light pollution complaints, and preserving the town’s suburban and semi-rural character. This law advances each of those objectives directly.
The Plan’s Economic Development section asks the town to accommodate new commercial and industrial uses — but only in areas well served by existing infrastructure and not in conflict with existing residential uses. Data centers meet neither condition here. The Plan names distribution centers, high-technology enterprises, filming, and autonomous vehicles as uses to accommodate. It does not name data centers.
The law follows the required process: a Type I action under SEQRA with coordinated review and a determination of significance before adoption, and referral to the Rockland County Department of Planning under General Municipal Law § 239-m.

Why this matters now

There is no application pending — and that is exactly the point. Zoning written while a specific project sits on the table is zoning written under pressure. Settling this now, as general legislation, means Clarkstown’s answer is already on the books the day someone comes asking — decided by the town’s own plan rather than by whoever gets to the counter first.

Common questions

What would the proposed Data Center & Crypto Mining Ban do?

A townwide prohibition on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities in every zoning district — written with no load threshold to game, no way to phase around it, and an express carve-out for the ordinary server rooms that businesses and schools already run.

Is the Data Center & Crypto Mining Ban in effect in Clarkstown?

No. It is a draft local law published by the Bondar for Clarkstown campaign for public discussion. To take effect it would have to be introduced, noticed for a public hearing and adopted by the Clarkstown Town Board.

Why is a Data Center & Crypto Mining Ban being proposed now?

There is no application pending — and that is exactly the point. Zoning written while a specific project sits on the table is zoning written under pressure. Settling this now, as general legislation, means Clarkstown’s answer is already on the books the day someone comes asking — decided by the town’s own plan rather than by whoever gets to the counter first.

Would the ban affect a business’s or school’s own server room?

No. An Accessory Data Center, an IT installation genuinely incidental to a principal use on the same lot, is expressly exempt, subject to limits on floor area, proportion, and connected electrical load.

Could a developer get around the ban with a small facility or by splitting a project?

No. The prohibition applies with no minimum electrical load, floor area, site area, server count, or hash rate, aggregates contiguous lots under common ownership or control, and applies regardless of phasing or what the project is called in an application.

Doesn’t the State control data center siting?

Executive Order No. 62’s state-permit abeyance expressly does not apply to local government approvals and reaches only facilities at or above 50 megawatts. The zoning decision is Clarkstown’s to make, including for everything below that threshold.

Where can I read the full text of the draft?

The complete draft of the Data Center & Crypto Mining Ban is published as a PDF on this page, and all four of the campaign's proposed laws are collected on the Proposed Laws page.

How do I comment on this proposal?

This is a draft for discussion. If you have expertise in energy, water, or land use — or you simply live near an industrial district — we want to hear from you before this is introduced. Use the feedback form and tell us what we got wrong.